• Low risk: cardboard (Image: Orora)
    Low risk: cardboard (Image: Orora)
Close×

The Real Media Collective has published research which shows that the coronavirus will live for much shorter time on carboard than on plastic packaging, which will carry the virus for two or three times longer.

The Australasian Paper Industry Association and The Real Media Collective, working collaboratively, have reviewed research and commentary in specific regard to the coronavirus lifespan on paper and other surfaces.

The research showed that viable coronavirus could be detected for up to 24 hours on cardboard, compared to up to two to three days on plastic-based packaging. However, the conclusion of the research is that all cardboard, and through this, assumption of paper or fibre-based products including mail, as well as polypropylene, and through this, assumption of low-grade plastics such as polyethylene for magazine wraps, carries a low risk of contamination.

When it comes to mail, the research revealed that as the print and mail processing time generally takes more than three days, mailbox deliveries including letters, magazines, and packages are safe.

The US Centre of Disease Control and Prevention said, “In general, because of poor survivability of these coronaviruses on surfaces, there is likely very low risk of spread from products or packaging that are shipped over a period of days or weeks at ambient temperatures."

Food & Drink Business

CCEP has completed a $39.7m manufacturing upgrade at its Kewdale facility in WA, installing a high-speed can production line that increases capacity by more than 40% and lifts production speeds to 1500 cans per minute.

Nearly 6 in 10 Aussies in food and beverage manufacturing believe their organisation is becoming less productive, despite continued investment in workplace technology, according to Argon & Co.

Every food, drink, personal care and household product made in Australia starts with an investment decision. A company chooses to replace a production line, automate a process or expand a plant. That choice is now made in a global market for capital, and Australia is struggling to compete. The question is simple. Will the next generation of manufacturing investment come here?